2009 Technology Symposium Keynote Address

Natasha Layton

Index of Slides : Graphic Version 800x600

  1. 2009 Technology Symposium Natasha Layton Keynote Address ILC WA - 24 March
  2. Relating the extent of AT provision to the extent of outcomes
  3. Why am I here?
  4. No Title
  5. My standpoint strives to include:
  6. 5
  7. How does the extent of assistive technology provision relate to outcomes?
  8. … but is assistive technology the thing that makes the difference?
  9. Ordering food at a restaurant for an individual with cerebral palsy who has severe athetosis and is non-vocal
  10. No Title
  11. Arizona State University Tots N’ Tech Project Campbell, P. H., Milbourne, S., & Jeanne Wilcox, M. (2008). Adaptation Interventions to Promote Participation in Natural Settings. Infants & Young Children, 21(2), 94-106
  12. Web to illustrate domains of impact of AT Solution by Campbell, P. H., Milbourne, S., & Jeanne Wilcox, M. (2008). Adaptation Interventions to Promote Participation in Natural Settings. Infants & Young Children, 21(2), 94-106.
  13. Working Definition
  14. What is a Societal Perspective of Assistive Technology?
  15. No Title
  16. No Title
  17. Solutions hierarchy triangle
  18. Government & Marketplace (Audit Commission 2002 UK)
  19. No Title
  20. Policy Rhetoric: current tension between old and new paradigms
  21. Victorian Aids & Equipment Program Redevelopment Service Delivery Model Discussion Paper November 2008
  22. www.disability.wa.gov.au
  23. No Title
  24. Hierarchy of concerns (see critique of rehabilitation model de Jonge, Scherer & Roger 2007)
  25. Dependence, Independence and Normality
  26. How to define life domains?
  27. Consider the relationship of ICF Domains to each other
  29. An alternate conceptualisation of life domains, honouring meta-domains
  30. No Title
  31. No Title
  32. What gets funded in Victoria?
  33. Other funders?
  34. No Title
  35. Clinical reasoning in constrained contexts
  36. No Title
  37. No Title
  38. Non-use of provided assistive technology devices (Wessels 2003)
  39. Hard and Soft Technologies (Odor, cited in Cook & Hussey 2008)
  40. 1.User-related personal factors
  41. 2. Device-related factors
  42. 3. Factors related to device market
  43. 4. Environmental factors
  44. Does AT use infer satisfaction?
  45. Articulating optimal outcomes: Palmer and Seale (2007)
  46. No Title
  47. No Title
  48. No Title
  49. The Equipment Survey
  50. Research Project AEAA, Buckland Foundation & Deakin University
  51. No Title

Return to Format List AT Economics